Politics in the ruins of digital interactivity: Digital detox and permacomputing

Authors

  • Thomas Berker Norwegian University of Science and Technology image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

ruination, infrapolitics, ultrapolitics, digital detox, permacomputing, platformisation

Abstract

Digital infrastructures increasingly serve people other than those whose everyday lives they infrastructure. This talk proposes infrapolitics (everyday politics too small to be seen) and ultrapolitics (politics of infrastructures too large and ubiquitous to register as political issues) as a way to look for non-nostalgic political options in the ruins of the 1990s promises of digital liberation, captured by platforms after 2000. Two cases are explored: digital detox, through 49 Guardian articles from 2011–2026, which after 2018 turns from commodified self-care toward infra- and ultrapolitical responses; and the permacomputing movement, which combines descent-ready everyday practice with political agitation and a concern for collapse, reckoning with ruins rather than returning to a life without digital tools. (abstract prepared with the help of gen AI, the manuscript itself is 100% written "manually")

References

Barbrook, Richard, and Andy Cameron. 1996. “The Californian Ideology.” Science as Culture 6 (1): 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455.

Beck, Ulrich. 1997. “SUBPOLITICS: Ecology and the Disintegration of Institutional Power.” Organization & Environment 10 (1): 52–65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26161654.

Berker, Thomas. 2023. “Domestication as User-Led Infrastructuring.” In The Routledge Handbook of Media and Technology Domestication, edited by Maren Hartmann. Routledge.

Butler, Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay (eds.). 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Duke University Press.

DeSilvey, Caitlin, and Tim Edensor. 2013. “Reckoning with Ruins.” Progress in Human Geography 37 (4): 465–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512462271.

Karasti, Helena, Karen S. Baker, and Florence Millerand. 2010. “Infrastructure Time: Long-Term Matters in Collaborative Development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19 (3): 377–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z.

Marres, Noortje. 2012. “The Experiment in Living.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford. Routledge.

Scott, James C. 2012. “Infrapolitics and Mobilizations: A Response by James C. Scott.” Revue Française d’études Américaines 131 (1): 112–17. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.131.0112.

Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–34.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, Andrew S. Mathews, and Nils Bubandt. 2019. “Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology: An Introduction to Supplement 20.” Current Anthropology 60 (S20): S186–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/703391.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. “Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action.” New Labor Forum 28 (1): 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

Issue

Section

Talks

Categories